Did you know? Codex Alimentarius released new guidance on when to use Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL). Begin Free PAL Assessment →
Did you know? Codex Alimentarius released new guidance on when to use Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL). Begin Free PAL Assessment →
Did you know? Codex Alimentarius released new guidance on when to use Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL). Begin Free PAL Assessment →
Did you know? Codex Alimentarius released new guidance on when to use Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL). Begin Free PAL Assessment →

Tag: Recipe Calculations

  • Allergens on Menus: Why Transparency Is Enterprise Risk Management

    Menu Allergen Transparency: Risk or ROI? | Food Regs
    THOUGHT LEADERSHIP • FOOD SERVICE RISK

    ALLERGENS ON MENUS: WHY TRANSPARENCY IS ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

    Dr. Laura Kirwan in Conversation Dr. Matthew Landry from UC Irvine

    Implementing proactive menu allergen transparency is essential for modern hospitality operators. In this discussion, Dr. Laura Kirwan and Dr. Matthew Landry examine California’s Allergen Disclosure for Dining Experiences (ADDE) Act. Specifically, they explain why clear ingredient communication protects diners and mitigates enterprise risk.

    WATCH DURATION: 5 MIN Allergens on Menus: A Conversation with Dr. Matthew Landry
    Watch directly on YouTube

    Dr. Matthew Landry is an Assistant Professor of Population Health and Disease Prevention at UC Irvine, as well as a registered dietitian nutritionist and public health researcher. During this conversation, Matthew explained why clear ingredient communication directly protects dining guests and public health.

    “For individuals that might have a food allergy, accurate information is a matter of safety. When restaurants and foodservice providers clearly communicate what the ingredients and allergens are, it builds trust around that knowledge.”

    DR. MATTHEW LANDRY
    Assistant Professor, UC Irvine

    Accurate ingredient declarations serve dual purposes across hospitality. First, detailed nutrition information allows health-conscious diners to match meals with personal goals. Second, transparent labeling protects patrons facing immediate allergic risks. Clear communication removes uncertainty for every guest who walks through the doors.

    CALIFORNIA ADDE ACT (SB-68): ALLERGENS ON MENUS

    California’s Allergen Disclosure for Dining Experiences (ADDE) Act establishes clear ground rules across the state. As Dr. Laura Kirwan noted during the discussion, regulatory shifts bring noticeable opportunities alongside real practical challenges.

    Matthew observed that one of the biggest benefits of the ADDE Act is consistency. Specifically, he pointed out that statutory standards “really help establish clear expectations for both what a foodservice operator needs to do and what consumers can expect anytime they enter an establishment.”

    Standardized guidelines establish consistent dining benchmarks. Customers know what allergen indicators to look for across different restaurant concepts. At the same time, hospitality businesses receive explicit requirements regarding what their menus must declare.

    Diners reviewing menu allergen transparency and deciding on dishes at a restaurant table
    Transparent allergen labeling allows diners to make confident, safe menu decisions without putting frontline staff in an uncomfortable guessing position.

    THE IMPLEMENTATION HURDLE: STAFF TRAINING AND STORE MEDIUMS

    Operational implementation remains the primary obstacle for restaurant groups. Both independent dining rooms and multi-unit chains face identical operational hurdles. In particular, operators must coordinate frontline service teams and maintain consistent messaging across all touchpoints.

    “When examining regulatory rollouts across dining environments, operators naturally wonder how to manage these demands practically. That makes actionable research and clear operator guidance essential for supporting real kitchens.”

    DR. LAURA KIRWAN
    Sustainability & Regulatory Lead, Nutritics

    Matthew reiterated that operational alignment is where teams face real friction. In the interview, he noted: “We have to get staff on board. We have to make sure that the language used across every medium inside the store is completely consistent. Communicating that out effectively is a particular challenge.”

    Service staff represent the frontline of guest interaction. However, relying on memory during busy meal rushes frequently leads to costly errors. In addition, discrepancies between printed menus, digital ordering displays, and kitchen prep guidelines leave businesses legally exposed.

    HOW PRACTICE-BASED TOOLS AND RESEARCH SUPPORT OPERATORS

    During the exchange, Dr. Laura Kirwan underscored the core question facing kitchens: “How do we translate research into practical tools that operators can actually use?”

    In response, Matthew explained that research must deliver field-tested solutions: “What we really need to do from a research standpoint is identify what are those best practices.”

    He highlighted the dual priorities of team confidence and consumer clarity: “How can staff feel confident communicating that information? What is the clearest way to visually display that to consumers?”

    Furthermore, Matthew stressed the necessity of supporting independent businesses: “How can we make sure it is feasible, especially for smaller operators who might not have as many resources?”

    By focusing on field-tested tools, research helps teams navigate new rules without disruption. In Matthew’s view, practical resources ensure that “it is feasible, especially for smaller operators who might not have as many resources.” When kitchens have straightforward guidance, they can protect their guests without adding unnecessary operational burden.

    REFRAMING REGULATION: FROM A BURDEN TO A RISK-MANAGEMENT WIN-WIN

    Restaurant operators often react with hesitation when facing new state directives. Viewing compliance as an unwanted chore is understandable in an industry facing tight margins and constant labor demands.

    “There can be some hesitance anytime new regulations come down the pipeline, thinking ‘this is just another thing to do.’ In many ways, it should be framed as an opportunity. Food allergens represent a real commercial risk for foodservice operators. Taking preventative steps creates a true win-win.”

    DR. MATTHEW LANDRY
    Assistant Professor, UC Irvine

    For Matthew, shifting this mindset changes the entire conversation. Rather than viewing compliance as administrative friction, hospitality teams can treat it as brand protection. Proactive menu allergen transparency protects guests at the table and builds lasting customer trust. In turn, preventative management shields businesses from costly operational mistakes.

    INDUSTRY COLLABORATION • ADDE KNOWLEDGE HUB

    ABOUT THE ADDE KNOWLEDGE HUB EXPERT CONSORTIUM

    Nutritics has brought together a consortium of industry experts for the ADDE Knowledge Hub, an industry-wide community dedicated to improving allergen transparency and supporting food businesses with allergen management.

    By bringing together experts from across the food industry, academia, and public health, the Knowledge Hub provides a platform for collaboration, knowledge sharing, and centralized best practice resources.

    CALIFORNIA STATUTORY COMPLIANCE PORTAL

    CALIFORNIA ADDE ACT (SB-68): COMPLETE OPERATOR REQUIREMENTS

    Review the 20-site national threshold rules, statutory compliance requirements, sub-ingredient tracking guidelines, and menu layout standards on our dedicated California regulatory portal.

  • Understanding the UK’s Nutrient Profiling Model (NPM): What the New HFSS Calculations Mean for Food Businesses

    Understanding the UK’s Nutrient Profiling Model (NPM): What the New HFSS Calculations Mean for Food Businesses

    UK NPM & HFSS Compliance Workspace

    Understanding the UK’s Nutrient Profiling Model: What the Updated HFSS Model Means for Food Businesses

    The UK Nutrient Profiling Model (NPM) classifies whether food or drink items are High in Fat, Salt, and Sugar (HFSS). This legal classification governs multi-buy promotions, retail placements, and advertising allowances throughout the United Kingdom.

    Why is this relevant to food business operators?

    Nutrient profiling impacts food service margins, kitchen recipes, and cross-channel marketing strategies. Businesses with 50 or more employees are legally restricted from placing or promoting less-healthy products in prominent locations.

    HOW DIFFERENT FOOD SECTORS ARE AFFECTED

    Select your specific market category below to review legal constraints and menu planning impacts.

    Pubs, bars and restaurants

    PUBS, BARS & RESTAURANTS

    [+]

    Restricts promotional pairings, sweetened beverages, and upselling loops. High-salt menu lines and desserts face critical assessment prior to seasonal marketing launches.

    Contract caterers

    CONTRACT CATERERS

    [+]

    Controls packaged product arrays sold inside schools, corporate dining venues, and healthcare points. Requires recipe version auditing across diverse service sites.

    Quick-service restaurants and takeaways

    QUICK-SERVICE & TAKEAWAY

    [+]

    Regulates digital upsells and promotional combos. Menus must configure portion rules and sugar caps to remain clear of TV watershed and online paid ad bans.

    Hotels

    HOTELS

    [+]

    Restricts cross-site promotions, breakfast packages, and room service bundles. Requires centralised verification to sync database menu classifications.

    Retail and grab-and-go food

    RETAIL & GRAB-AND-GO

    [+]

    Imposes rigid location placement caps. Regulated snack selections, sweet drinks, and chocolate items are barred from checkout lanes and high-footfall aisle ends.

    Food suppliers and wholesalers

    SUPPLIERS & WHOLESALERS

    [+]

    Obligated to provide verified carbohydrate and sugar breakdown fractions, dietary fibre values, and ingredient ratios to downstream foodservice kitchens.

    HFSS MARKETING & PLACEMENT RESTRICTIONS

    How to verify if a product is legally restricted from placement, pricing, or promotional activities:

    Step One
    Is the product in a regulated category?

    The food or drink must fall within one of the regulated product categories specified in the UK promotion or advertising regulations.

    Step Two
    Does it meet the less-healthy NPM limit?

    The food or drink must meet or exceed the less-healthy NPM score limit (Food score ≥ 4, or Drink score ≥ 1).

    Restriction Type Prohibited Actions Foodservice Relevance Regulatory Nuance & Scope
    Store placement Cannot display in-scope products on checkouts, aisle ends, or store entrances. Directly impacts grab-and-go kiosk designs and counter merchandising. England only. Applies to businesses with ≥ 50 employees and store areas > 185.8 sqm (2,000 sqft). Micro/small brands exempt.
    Online placement Banned on digital checkout pipelines, app recommendation tabs, and home screens. Restricts upselling prompts inside digital order terminals or proprietary delivery apps. England only. Applies to digital interfaces where food is offered for sale to English audiences. Employee threshold: ≥ 50.
    Volume-price promos Bans BOGO (Buy One Get One Free) or multi-buy discounts. Applies to packaged items, snacking lines, and bottled drinks sold. England only. Banned for in-scope categories. Applies to businesses with ≥ 50 employees. Does not affect menu pairings inside standard restaurants.
    Free refills Bans free self-service refills of sugar-sweetened beverages. Directly impacts quick-service drink stations and restaurant dining loops. England only. Covers free refills, top-ups, and self-service sugar-sweetened fountain dispensers. Employee threshold: ≥ 50.
    Television & On-Demand Cannot advertise identifiable less-healthy products on television or on-demand programme feeds between 5.30 am and 9.00 pm. Bans broadcast marketing, catch-up video ads, and programme sponsorships for restricted menu lines during key hours. UK-Wide. Governed by the Health and Care Act 2022. Excludes small businesses with < 250 employees. Applies specifically to identifiable products.
    Paid Online Advertising Bans paid online advertising (including paid search networks, boosted social posts, app store banners, and digital display campaigns) at all times. Bans paid digital placements targeting UK users across search, social, and proprietary online interfaces. UK-Wide. Full 24/7 ban on paid-for promotions targeting UK consumers online. Excludes small businesses (< 250 employees) and brand-only advertising.

    HIGH IN FAT, SALT AND SUGAR (HFSS) CALCULATIONS

    The UK model calculates a score by looking at a product’s recipe per 100g or 100ml. It balances “bad” nutrients like sugar, salt, and saturated fat (A Points) against “good” ingredients like fruit, veg, protein, and fibre (C Points).

    A POINTS (Nutrients to Limit)

    Maximum 40 points awarded for:

    • Energy (kJ)
    • Saturated fat (g)
    • Sugars (g)
    • Sodium (mg) or Salt (g)

    C POINTS (Nutrients to Encourage)

    Maximum 15 points awarded for:

    • Fruit, Vegetables, Nuts, Seeds, & Pulses (FVNS) (%)
    • Dietary Fibre (g)
    • Protein (g)
    The Core Formula Nutrient Profiling Score = Total ‘A’ Points − Total ‘C’ Points

    CHECK YOUR HFSS SCORE

    Select a regulated product category and adjust the score slider to review direct marketing impact.

    Shared Threshold Rules (2004/05 & 2018 Models)
    FOOD SCORE NOT HIGH IN FAT, SALT OR SUGAR
    COMPLIANT (NOT HIGH IN FAT, SALT OR SUGAR)
    -15 +40
    Score: +3
    Promotion Status: —

    The lower the score, the healthier the product.

    -15 is the lowest (healthiest) score and +40 is the highest (unhealthiest) score possible.

    Foods scoring 4 or more, and drinks scoring 1 or more, are classified as less healthy (High in Fat, Salt and Sugar) under both frameworks.

    COMPARING THE 2004/05 AND 2018 MODELS

    While the final point thresholds to trigger an HFSS restriction remain exactly the same under both models (Foods ≥ 4, Drinks ≥ 1), how you calculate those points is shifting. The updated 2018 model introduces tighter calculations – specifically swapping total sugars out for “free” sugars based on the WHO Free Sugars Intake Guidelines, using advanced AOAC dietary fibre testing, and splitting up fruit and vegetable weights. Use the table below to see how these underlying rules compare.

    Component UK NPM 2004/05 (Current) UK NPM 2018 (Proposed)
    Sugars Calculated based on total sugars per 100g/ml. Calculated based strictly on free sugars.
    Fibre Uses Non-Starch Polysaccharide (NSP) fibre (Englyst method). Uses Total Dietary Fibre (AOAC method).
    Fruit and Vegetables FVNS elements combined inside a single percentage. Fruit and vegetable weights scored separately from nuts and seeds.
    Dried Fruit Dried fruit weight is multiplied by 2 in FVN calculation. Dried fruit weight is multiplied by 3 in calculations.
    Protein Scoring Protein points deducted if A score is under 11. Protein points restricted if A score exceeds 11, unless FVNS score is at least 5.
    Thresholds Foods ≥ 4, Drinks ≥ 1. Foods ≥ 4, Drinks ≥ 1.

    OPERATIONAL COMPLIANCE & RE-FORMULATION CHALLENGES

    Calculating an HFSS score once is simple, but keeping your entire menu compliant over time is a major operational challenge. A single ingredient swap by a supplier, a minor recipe tweak in the kitchen, or a change in cooking methods can instantly push a compliant product into the restricted category. Here is why manual spreadsheets fall short and how businesses manage compliance risk:

    Recalculating Existing Products

    [+]

    Existing HFSS calculations may need to be reviewed if the updated model is introduced. Rather than recalculating every recipe manually, recipe management systems (RMM) can automatically update scores whenever recipes, ingredients or legislation change.

    Data Availability and Quality

    [+]

    Data availability and quality must be reviewed to make sure they support accurate HFSS calculations. If ingredient data is missing or incorrect, calculations will be wrong. Businesses may need to work with suppliers, wholesalers, manufacturers, or recipe and menu management experts to identify suitable, reliable sources.

    Calculating Free Sugars

    [+]

    Free sugars replace total sugars in the updated model. They are not declared on nutrition labels and cannot be measured through routine laboratory analysis, meaning calculations depend on detailed ingredient and recipe data. This reflects recommendations from both WHO and SACN.

    Classifying Ingredients

    [+]

    The updated model distinguishes between intact fruit, juices, purées, dried fruit, vegetables, nuts, seeds and pulses. Keeping ingredients correctly classified is essential for accurate scoring.

    Fibre Data

    [+]

    NPM 2018 uses AOAC fibre instead of NSP (Englyst) fibre. Older supplier specifications may therefore require updating before products can be assessed accurately.

    Cooking Methods and Factors

    [+]

    Cooking methods alter nutritional values through moisture loss, fat absorption, and product shrinkage. Raw ingredient profiling is legally insufficient to prove cooked menu compliance.

    Supplier & Recipe Changes

    [+]

    A new supplier, ingredient or recipe can change an HFSS score. Businesses managing hundreds of recipes need a reliable way to identify affected products and automatically recalculate results.

    Ongoing Compliance

    [+]

    HFSS calculations should not be treated as a one-off exercise. Recipe management systems help maintain a single source of truth by automatically updating calculations, tracking recipe versions and supporting consistent compliance across every site.

    AUTOMATING COMPLIANCE USING DIGITAL RECIPE MANAGEMENT

    Recipe Management Systems (RMS) automate complex nutrient profiling, track supplier changes, handle yield adjustments, and generate consistent, legal, and audit-ready HFSS scoring portfolios across multi-site foodservice operations.

    CONCLUSION

    The proposed transition to UK NPM 2018 increases reporting requirements and introduces complex data points. Food servce operators need to evaluate their process and start preparing for the updated HFSS calculations and associated restrictions in order to remain compliant.