Did you know? Codex Alimentarius released new guidance on when to use Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL). Begin Free PAL Assessment →
Did you know? Codex Alimentarius released new guidance on when to use Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL). Begin Free PAL Assessment →
Did you know? Codex Alimentarius released new guidance on when to use Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL). Begin Free PAL Assessment →
Did you know? Codex Alimentarius released new guidance on when to use Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL). Begin Free PAL Assessment →

Category: UK

  • Food service green claims guide: Navigating the Green Claims Code and Empowering Consumers Directive (EmpCO)

    Food service green claims guide: Navigating the Green Claims Code and Empowering Consumers Directive (EmpCO)

    Food Service Green Claims Guide: Navigating the Green Claims Code & Empowering Consumers Directive (EmpCO)
    FOOD SERVICE REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

    FOOD SERVICE GREEN CLAIMS GUIDE
    NAVIGATING THE GREEN CLAIMS CODE AND EMPOWERING CONSUMERS DIRECTIVE (EmpCO)

    Environmental claims across food service operations – such as “sustainably farmed”, “eco-friendly packaging”, or “low-carbon dish” – are now subject to strict legal enforcement in the UK and Europe.

    Regulators have moved beyond voluntary guidelines to mandatory consumer protection laws with severe financial penalties. Food service businesses operating in the UK must comply with the CMA’s established Green Claims Code, while those distributing across Europe must prepare for the EU Empowering Consumers Directive (EmpCO) deadline of September 2026.

    Food service operators must now align packaging, menus, and digital marketing copy with the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) established Green Claims Code, and the EU’s incoming Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive (EmpCO EU 2024/825).

    EXISTING REGULATIONS VS. EMPOWERING CONSUMERS DIRECTIVE (EmpCO): WHAT IS CHANGING?

    Environmental marketing in food service is transitioning from voluntary self-regulation to legally binding prohibition backed by direct financial penalties. To safeguard business margins and brand reputation, commercial buyers and operations leads must evaluate how existing rules compare with incoming legislation:

    EXISTING REGULATION: UK CMA GREEN CLAIMS CODE & ASA

    EXISTING LEGISLATION

    • 6 Core Principles: Claims must be truthful, unambiguous, account for full lifecycle impact, backed by verified evidence, and offer fair comparisons under the CMA Green Claims Code.
    • Broad Operational Scope: Covers all consumer-facing channels including digital menus, takeaway packaging, social media marketing, and delivery aggregator listings.
    • Enforcement & Direct Fines: Co-regulated by the UK CMA and the ASA, backed by direct civil penalties of up to 10% of global annual turnover under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024.
    INCOMING LEGISLATION: EU EmpCO DIRECTIVE (EU 2024/825)

    NEW LEGISLATION (September 2026)

    • Blacklisting Generic Terms: Total prohibition of generic descriptors like “eco-friendly,” “green,” “bio-based,” or “climate-smart” without verified, recognized environmental excellence.
    • Total Carbon Offset Ban: Strict legal ban on claiming menu items or packaging are “carbon neutral,” “net zero,” or “climate-compensated” via external offset purchases under EmpCO Directive (EU 2024/825).
    • Verification Mandate: In-house eco-badges or custom environmental logos are not allowed unless backed by official public schemes or accredited third-party certification.

    COMMERCIAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACT ON FOOD SERVICE BUYERS

    Substantial Financial Risk: Relying on unverified supplier claims or offset credits leaves businesses exposed to severe regulatory fines (up to 10% of turnover under UK DMCC powers) and forced public retractment notices. Food service leads must transition away from manual, paper-based claims tracking toward automated, software-driven Lifecycle Assessments (LCA) at the recipe and ingredient level.

    THE THREE PILLARS OF LEGAL GREEN CLAIMS COMPLIANCE IN FOOD SERVICE

    Achieving long-term compliance across catering and food service operations relies on three core operational pillars:

    Compliance manager auditing automated food service recipe LCA and packaging environmental claims softwarePILLAR 1

    AUTOMATED LIFECYCLE SUBSTANTIATION

    Under the CMA Green Claims Code, claims must evaluate full product lifecycle impact. Highlighting sustainable agricultural sourcing while ignoring non-recyclable packaging or high-emission processing constitutes unlawful greenwashing.

    Food packaging green claims audit removing prohibited generic eco tags and carbon offset claimsPILLAR 2

    ELIMINATION OF OFFSET & GENERIC CLAIMS

    The EmpCO Directive (EU 2024/825) explicitly bans generic claims like “green” or “eco-friendly.” Crucially, claiming a food dish or meal kit is “carbon neutral” based on tree-planting offset schemes is legally blacklisted.

    Food service procurement team verifying automated recipe carbon accounting and Scope 3 emissions calculationsPILLAR 3

    VERIFIED CERTIFICATIONS & SCIENCE DATA

    Environmental claims and eco-scores must be backed by official public schemes or accredited third-party verification. Future carbon reduction claims require transparent, publicly accessible implementation roadmaps verified by external audit data.

    ACTION PLAN FOR GREEN CLAIMS CONTROL IN FOOD SERVICE

    Commercial buyers and operations directors must embed automated compliance into daily workflows. Follow this 6-step action plan to mitigate risk and streamline environmental marketing across your brand:

    1. AUDIT ALL PACKAGING & MENU CLAIMS

    Conduct a complete inventory of every environmental claim printed on takeaway containers, hot cup sleeves, napkins, printed menus, digital ordering apps, and marketing channels. Flag all unverified claims for immediate correction.

    2. ELIMINATE UNVERIFIED CARBON OFFSET STATEMENTS

    Immediately remove claims like “Carbon Neutral Lunch” or “Climate Compensated Meal” that rely on tree-planting or external carbon credits. Under the EmpCO Directive, claims of climate neutrality based on offsetting are banned.

    3. IMPLEMENT AUTOMATED RECIPE-LEVEL CARBON ACCOUNTING

    Replace manual spreadsheets with automated recipe management software that calculates CO2e per dish directly from supplier ingredient databases. Software-driven LCA calculations provide instant audit trails required by regulators like the CMA.

    4. SCRUB GENERIC ‘ECO’ LABELS & UNACCREDITED LOGOS

    Replace generic descriptors like “100% Eco-Friendly” or self-designed “Green Choice” leaf badges. All environmental symbols must belong to officially recognized public certification schemes or independent third-party verification standards.

    5. ALIGN WITH THIRD-PARTY CERTIFICATIONS & PUBLIC SCHEMES

    Ensure packaging claims cite specific, recognized standards (such as FSC, PEFC, or EN 13432 industrial compostability). If advertising corporate carbon targets, publish detailed, externally monitored implementation roadmaps.

    6. PUBLISH REAL-TIME DYNAMIC CARBON MENUS

    Publishing clear, QR-accessible digital menus integrated with live recipe environmental software allows consumers to view verified dish footprints (A-E carbon ratings or CO2e grams) directly, protecting caterers from misleading marketing liability.

    INTERACTIVE DIAGNOSTIC TOOL

    CHECK IF YOUR GREEN CLAIM ALIGNS WITH RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICE

    Select the option that best describes your menu, packaging, or marketing environmental claim to evaluate how well it aligns with established guidelines under the Green Claims Code and incoming EmpCO rules.

    BEST PRACTICE MANAGEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MARKETING

    To exceed statutory benchmarks and protect your business against enforcement actions, implement these commercial safeguards:

    • INTEGRATED RECIPE-LEVEL LCA SOFTWARE:
      Connect central recipe and procurement software directly to peer-reviewed environmental databases to automate dish carbon footprinting and eliminate manual calculation errors.
    • CENTRAL COMPLIANCE REGISTER:
      Maintain a centralized digital repository of independent lab testing reports, supplier LCA declarations, and environmental certifications for every packaging SKU and menu item.
    • EXPLICIT DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS:
      Avoid vague terms like “biodegradable” or “compostable.” Clearly state disposal requirements (e.g., “Compostable via Industrial Facilities Only – Do Not Home Compost”).

    INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR GREEN CLAIMS: TRADING STANDARDS & CMA

    REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT FRAMEWORKS

    Under the UK Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, the CMA possesses direct enforcement power to impose substantial financial penalties (up to 10% of global turnover) without court action for deceptive green claims. Concurrently, Local Trading Standards and the ASA monitor misleading advertising across print, packaging, and digital menus.

    Consolidate all supplier specification sheets, dish lifecycle assessment data, and certification evidence in a dedicated green claims audit folder for immediate regulator review.

    READY FOR THE GREEN CLAIMS COMPLIANCE DEADLINE?

    Do not leave menu copy, carbon claims, and food packaging specs to commercial risk. Audit active packaging lines, evaluate automated recipe LCA tools, and clean unverified environmental claims today.

  • Understanding the UK’s Nutrient Profiling Model (NPM): What the New HFSS Calculations Mean for Food Businesses

    Understanding the UK’s Nutrient Profiling Model (NPM): What the New HFSS Calculations Mean for Food Businesses

    UK NPM & HFSS Compliance Workspace

    Understanding the UK’s Nutrient Profiling Model: What the Updated HFSS Model Means for Food Businesses

    The UK Nutrient Profiling Model (NPM) classifies whether food or drink items are High in Fat, Salt, and Sugar (HFSS). This legal classification governs multi-buy promotions, retail placements, and advertising allowances throughout the United Kingdom.

    Why is this relevant to food business operators?

    Nutrient profiling impacts food service margins, kitchen recipes, and cross-channel marketing strategies. Businesses with 50 or more employees are legally restricted from placing or promoting less-healthy products in prominent locations.

    HOW DIFFERENT FOOD SECTORS ARE AFFECTED

    Select your specific market category below to review legal constraints and menu planning impacts.

    Pubs, bars and restaurants

    PUBS, BARS & RESTAURANTS

    [+]

    Restricts promotional pairings, sweetened beverages, and upselling loops. High-salt menu lines and desserts face critical assessment prior to seasonal marketing launches.

    Contract caterers

    CONTRACT CATERERS

    [+]

    Controls packaged product arrays sold inside schools, corporate dining venues, and healthcare points. Requires recipe version auditing across diverse service sites.

    Quick-service restaurants and takeaways

    QUICK-SERVICE & TAKEAWAY

    [+]

    Regulates digital upsells and promotional combos. Menus must configure portion rules and sugar caps to remain clear of TV watershed and online paid ad bans.

    Hotels

    HOTELS

    [+]

    Restricts cross-site promotions, breakfast packages, and room service bundles. Requires centralised verification to sync database menu classifications.

    Retail and grab-and-go food

    RETAIL & GRAB-AND-GO

    [+]

    Imposes rigid location placement caps. Regulated snack selections, sweet drinks, and chocolate items are barred from checkout lanes and high-footfall aisle ends.

    Food suppliers and wholesalers

    SUPPLIERS & WHOLESALERS

    [+]

    Obligated to provide verified carbohydrate and sugar breakdown fractions, dietary fibre values, and ingredient ratios to downstream foodservice kitchens.

    HFSS MARKETING & PLACEMENT RESTRICTIONS

    How to verify if a product is legally restricted from placement, pricing, or promotional activities:

    Step One
    Is the product in a regulated category?

    The food or drink must fall within one of the regulated product categories specified in the UK promotion or advertising regulations.

    Step Two
    Does it meet the less-healthy NPM limit?

    The food or drink must meet or exceed the less-healthy NPM score limit (Food score ≥ 4, or Drink score ≥ 1).

    Restriction Type Prohibited Actions Foodservice Relevance Regulatory Nuance & Scope
    Store placement Cannot display in-scope products on checkouts, aisle ends, or store entrances. Directly impacts grab-and-go kiosk designs and counter merchandising. England only. Applies to businesses with ≥ 50 employees and store areas > 185.8 sqm (2,000 sqft). Micro/small brands exempt.
    Online placement Banned on digital checkout pipelines, app recommendation tabs, and home screens. Restricts upselling prompts inside digital order terminals or proprietary delivery apps. England only. Applies to digital interfaces where food is offered for sale to English audiences. Employee threshold: ≥ 50.
    Volume-price promos Bans BOGO (Buy One Get One Free) or multi-buy discounts. Applies to packaged items, snacking lines, and bottled drinks sold. England only. Banned for in-scope categories. Applies to businesses with ≥ 50 employees. Does not affect menu pairings inside standard restaurants.
    Free refills Bans free self-service refills of sugar-sweetened beverages. Directly impacts quick-service drink stations and restaurant dining loops. England only. Covers free refills, top-ups, and self-service sugar-sweetened fountain dispensers. Employee threshold: ≥ 50.
    Television & On-Demand Cannot advertise identifiable less-healthy products on television or on-demand programme feeds between 5.30 am and 9.00 pm. Bans broadcast marketing, catch-up video ads, and programme sponsorships for restricted menu lines during key hours. UK-Wide. Governed by the Health and Care Act 2022. Excludes small businesses with < 250 employees. Applies specifically to identifiable products.
    Paid Online Advertising Bans paid online advertising (including paid search networks, boosted social posts, app store banners, and digital display campaigns) at all times. Bans paid digital placements targeting UK users across search, social, and proprietary online interfaces. UK-Wide. Full 24/7 ban on paid-for promotions targeting UK consumers online. Excludes small businesses (< 250 employees) and brand-only advertising.

    HIGH IN FAT, SALT AND SUGAR (HFSS) CALCULATIONS

    The UK model calculates a score by looking at a product’s recipe per 100g or 100ml. It balances “bad” nutrients like sugar, salt, and saturated fat (A Points) against “good” ingredients like fruit, veg, protein, and fibre (C Points).

    A POINTS (Nutrients to Limit)

    Maximum 40 points awarded for:

    • Energy (kJ)
    • Saturated fat (g)
    • Sugars (g)
    • Sodium (mg) or Salt (g)

    C POINTS (Nutrients to Encourage)

    Maximum 15 points awarded for:

    • Fruit, Vegetables, Nuts, Seeds, & Pulses (FVNS) (%)
    • Dietary Fibre (g)
    • Protein (g)
    The Core Formula Nutrient Profiling Score = Total ‘A’ Points − Total ‘C’ Points

    CHECK YOUR HFSS SCORE

    Select a regulated product category and adjust the score slider to review direct marketing impact.

    Shared Threshold Rules (2004/05 & 2018 Models)
    FOOD SCORE NOT HIGH IN FAT, SALT OR SUGAR
    COMPLIANT (NOT HIGH IN FAT, SALT OR SUGAR)
    -15 +40
    Score: +3
    Promotion Status:

    The lower the score, the healthier the product.

    -15 is the lowest (healthiest) score and +40 is the highest (unhealthiest) score possible.

    Foods scoring 4 or more, and drinks scoring 1 or more, are classified as less healthy (High in Fat, Salt and Sugar) under both frameworks.

    COMPARING THE 2004/05 AND 2018 MODELS

    While the final point thresholds to trigger an HFSS restriction remain exactly the same under both models (Foods ≥ 4, Drinks ≥ 1), how you calculate those points is shifting. The updated 2018 model introduces tighter calculations – specifically swapping total sugars out for “free” sugars based on the WHO Free Sugars Intake Guidelines, using advanced AOAC dietary fibre testing, and splitting up fruit and vegetable weights. Use the table below to see how these underlying rules compare.

    Component UK NPM 2004/05 (Current) UK NPM 2018 (Proposed)
    Sugars Calculated based on total sugars per 100g/ml. Calculated based strictly on free sugars.
    Fibre Uses Non-Starch Polysaccharide (NSP) fibre (Englyst method). Uses Total Dietary Fibre (AOAC method).
    Fruit and Vegetables FVNS elements combined inside a single percentage. Fruit and vegetable weights scored separately from nuts and seeds.
    Dried Fruit Dried fruit weight is multiplied by 2 in FVN calculation. Dried fruit weight is multiplied by 3 in calculations.
    Protein Scoring Protein points deducted if A score is under 11. Protein points restricted if A score exceeds 11, unless FVNS score is at least 5.
    Thresholds Foods ≥ 4, Drinks ≥ 1. Foods ≥ 4, Drinks ≥ 1.

    OPERATIONAL COMPLIANCE & RE-FORMULATION CHALLENGES

    Calculating an HFSS score once is simple, but keeping your entire menu compliant over time is a major operational challenge. A single ingredient swap by a supplier, a minor recipe tweak in the kitchen, or a change in cooking methods can instantly push a compliant product into the restricted category. Here is why manual spreadsheets fall short and how businesses manage compliance risk:

    Recalculating Existing Products

    [+]

    Existing HFSS calculations may need to be reviewed if the updated model is introduced. Rather than recalculating every recipe manually, recipe management systems (RMM) can automatically update scores whenever recipes, ingredients or legislation change.

    Data Availability and Quality

    [+]

    Data availability and quality must be reviewed to make sure they support accurate HFSS calculations. If ingredient data is missing or incorrect, calculations will be wrong. Businesses may need to work with suppliers, wholesalers, manufacturers, or recipe and menu management experts to identify suitable, reliable sources.

    Calculating Free Sugars

    [+]

    Free sugars replace total sugars in the updated model. They are not declared on nutrition labels and cannot be measured through routine laboratory analysis, meaning calculations depend on detailed ingredient and recipe data. This reflects recommendations from both WHO and SACN.

    Classifying Ingredients

    [+]

    The updated model distinguishes between intact fruit, juices, purées, dried fruit, vegetables, nuts, seeds and pulses. Keeping ingredients correctly classified is essential for accurate scoring.

    Fibre Data

    [+]

    NPM 2018 uses AOAC fibre instead of NSP (Englyst) fibre. Older supplier specifications may therefore require updating before products can be assessed accurately.

    Cooking Methods and Factors

    [+]

    Cooking methods alter nutritional values through moisture loss, fat absorption, and product shrinkage. Raw ingredient profiling is legally insufficient to prove cooked menu compliance.

    Supplier & Recipe Changes

    [+]

    A new supplier, ingredient or recipe can change an HFSS score. Businesses managing hundreds of recipes need a reliable way to identify affected products and automatically recalculate results.

    Ongoing Compliance

    [+]

    HFSS calculations should not be treated as a one-off exercise. Recipe management systems help maintain a single source of truth by automatically updating calculations, tracking recipe versions and supporting consistent compliance across every site.

    AUTOMATING COMPLIANCE USING DIGITAL RECIPE MANAGEMENT

    Recipe Management Systems (RMS) automate complex nutrient profiling, track supplier changes, handle yield adjustments, and generate consistent, legal, and audit-ready HFSS scoring portfolios across multi-site foodservice operations.

    CONCLUSION

    The proposed transition to UK NPM 2018 increases reporting requirements and introduces complex data points. Food servce operators need to evaluate their process and start preparing for the updated HFSS calculations and associated restrictions in order to remain compliant.

  • Preparing for Benedict’s Law (September 2026 Deadline)

    Preparing for Benedict’s Law (September 2026 Deadline)

    ALLERGEN MANAGEMENT IN SCHOOLS

    THE SEPTEMBER 2026 DEADLINE
    PREPARING FOR BENEDICT’S LAW

    From September 2026, Benedict’s Law introduces mandatory guidelines for managing food allergens in schools across England. Educational trusts and caterers must act now to implement localised safety policies, control common allergens, standardise emergency protocols, and complete mandatory staff training.

    Benedict’s Law is named after Benedict Blythe, who tragically died from an allergic reaction at school. This new statutory framework replaces inconsistent local guidelines with uniform, mandatory safety standards for food allergens across all state-funded schools and academies in England, aligning with the new official statutory allergy safety guidance in schools issued by the Department for Education.

    THE THREE PILLARS FOR MANAGING ALLERGENS UNDER THE September 2026 MANDATE

    Compliance is built on three mandatory operational pillars:

    School administrator writing food allergens guidelines and policies on a laptopPILLAR 1

    MANDATORY LOCALISED ALLERGENS SAFETY POLICIES

    Schools must publish and maintain a dedicated policy for food allergens. This must detail specific kitchen cross-contact limits, playground eating areas, and classroom ingredient rules.

    Emergency adrenaline auto-injector pen used for severe reaction to allergensPILLAR 2

    EMERGENCY ADRENALINE (AAI) PATHWAYS FOR SEVERE ALLERGENS

    Schools must maintain spare, non-prescribed adrenaline auto-injectors (AAIs) in an unlocked, central location to treat severe reactions to allergens. Expiry dates and batch numbers must be logged monthly.

    Educational staff training session on managing food allergens safelyPILLAR 3

    STANDARDISED EMERGENCY DRILLS & TRAINING

    All kitchen, supervision, and teaching staff must complete accredited training on food allergens. Schools must run practical emergency response drills matching standard fire safety routines.

    ACTION PLAN FOR ALLERGENS CONTROL IN CATERING

    Catering leads must translate these school-wide policies into daily, repeatable kitchen operations. Follow this step-by-step action plan to prevent cross-contact from major allergens during busy food services:

    1. AUDIT SUPPLIER DATA & BLOCK SUBSTITUTIONS

    Ensure suppliers provide written ingredient and allergens logs. If any product is substituted, quarantine and block it from menus until kitchen leads verify the updated ingredient specifications.

    2. ENFORCE COLOUR-CODED KITCHEN SEGREGATION

    Set up dedicated prep stations with colour-coded tables, chopping boards, and cooking tools for menus prepared without major allergens. Keep raw ingredients containing allergens sealed in separate, designated storage zones.

    3. CONSTRUCT LIVE DAILY ALLERGEN MATRICES

    Do not rely on outdated paper recipes. Update a live, digital matrix for food allergens every morning matching the exact dishes and batches being served. This must be instantly accessible to all staff and compliance inspectors.

    4. SYNCHRONISE WITH PUPIL IDENTIFICATION PATHWAYS FOR ALLERGENS SAFETY

    Serving staff must have a foolproof method to identify pupils affected by food allergens. Work with school staff to implement visible safety identifiers, such as colour-coded trays, wristbands, or digital profile pictures.

    5. RUN JOINT KITCHEN EMERGENCY RESPONSE DRILLS FOR ALLERGENS

    Include kitchen and midday supervision teams in school emergency drills for severe reactions to allergens. Staff must know where spare AAIs are kept, how to contact a first aider instantly, and how to rapidly evacuate or clear the hall if needed.

    6. PUBLISH FILTERABLE DIGITAL MENUS

    Publishing live, filterable digital menus (via platforms like Nutritics or TenKites) allows parents to check the 14 major allergens and pre-plan safe meals from home, eliminating counter-side communication errors.

    BEST PRACTICE MANAGEMENT FOR FOOD ALLERGENS

    To exceed minimum legal benchmarks and avoid food safety inspection failures regarding allergens, implement these proactive safeguards:

    • DIGITAL ALLERGEN MANAGEMENT:
      Link central recipe software directly to supplier databases to auto-block ingredients containing undeclared allergens if specifications change. Ensure menu information is updated in real-time.
    • PHOTOGRAPHIC COUNTER PROFILES:
      Maintain clear, photo-supported identity charts for pupils with severe sensitivities to allergens behind food counters for immediate visual verification during high-speed meal service.
    • NEAR-MISS LOGGING SYSTEMS:
      Log supplier delivery mistakes, close calls, and minor kitchen mix-ups regarding food allergens inside a central safety registry to fix vulnerabilities before they lead to an incident.

    INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR ALLERGENS: OFSTED & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

    REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS

    During routine inspections, Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) will audit food prep teams to verify they can instantly supply written, accurate matrices for allergens across any food batch served. Ofsted inspectors focus heavily on safeguarding protocols, staff training logs, and practical emergency safety readiness.

    Keep all updated training logs, supplier specification sheets, and local policy documents consolidated in your central compliance folder.

    READY FOR THE SEPTEMBER DEADLINE?

    Do not leave school dining safety to last-minute checks. Audit your active menus, contact your suppliers, and organise segregated, colour-coded preparation areas for allergens control today.